10 Dec Current doctrine accepts that goal, as reflected in FM “IPB is an analytical methodology employed to reduce uncertainty con-. This page contains the US Army Field Manual on Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield. *FM FIELD MANUAL Headquarters. Department of the Army. Washington, DC, 8 July INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE.
|Published (Last):||11 September 2008|
|PDF File Size:||2.79 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.21 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The details these tools provide are the basis of an effective intelligence collection plan.
The relationship of the IPB process to each step in the decision making process is discussed below see Figure Therefore, staffs should ensure they use IPB, wargaming, and intelligence 34-1330 as dynamic tools rather than as one-time events. The ISOS is the flexible architecture of procedures, organizations, and equipment that collect, process, store, and disseminate intelligence.
Forgotten Password Create Account. IPB products also enable staffs to exploit the modem technology of the ISOS by focusing collection systems that now 34-1330 near-real-time NRT information in sufficient accuracy to conduct direct targeting. As intelligence confirms or denies planning assumptions on the battlefield environment or the threat’s COA, a continuous IPB process identifies new intelligence requirements.
The enemy COA models developed in step 4 are the products that the staff will use to portray the threat in the decision making and targeting processes. The newer version is restricted and can only be obtained by direct contact with the issuing authories.
At this level it requires little formal education beyond realistic field training exercises FTXs against a “savvy” enemy. IPB identities the facts and assumptions about the battlefield and the threat that allow effective staff planning.
fm 34-130 intelligence preparation of the battlefield
Sign In Sign Out. IPB helps the commander identify his intelligence requirements and provides the focus and direction needed to satisfy them.
Some of these involve employment of the ISOS assets under his control. This guidance generates additional intelligence requirements in support of each potential friendly COA the targeting process supports. Using the results of staff wargaming and IPB as a guide, they decide The purpose of this manual is to describe the fundamentals of intelligence preparation of the battlefield IPB. The description of the battlefield’s effects identifies constraints on potential friendly COAs and may reveal implied missions.
If BDA is required to support the command’s COA, the collection manager plans collection to satisfy that set of requirements as well.
FM 34-130 Intelligence Prep of the Battlefield
IPB supports further development of requirements by identifying the activity which will satisfy each requirement and where and when the activity is expected to occur.
Given what the threat normally prefers to do, and the effects of the specific environment in which he is operating now, what are his likely objectives and the COAs available to him? ATPRisk Management – It also identifies opportunities the battlefield environment presents, such as avenues of approach, engagement areas, and zones of entry, which the staff integrates into potential friendly COAs and their 3-130 estimates.
As the operation unfolds and the enemy’s intentions become more clear, reinitiate the IPB and decision making processes as needed.
FM INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE BATTLEFIELD – INITIAL DRAFT (December )
Furthermore, every staff officer should prepare detailed IPB products tailored for his own functional area. The results and products of IPB, conveyed in the intelligence estimate, are essential elements 34–130 the decision making process.
The bottom line is that every soldier conducts IPB. Both the event template and event matrix depict the times during which the activity 34-30 expected to occur. Every commander and staff officer needs to think through the effects the environment has on both threat and friendly operations.
fm intelligence preparation of the battlefield Download ( Pages | Free )
The commander bases his initial intelligence requirements on the dm gaps identified during IPB in the mission analysis step of the decision making process. Step 2 evaluates the effects of the environment with which both sides must contend. However, the MI unit commander will use the IPB process to support his own unique planning requirements.
This manual is intended to serve as a guide for the use of IPB by units of all types, at all echelons, across the entire spectrum of conflict, and during the conduct of any mission.
Generally, these are analyzed in more detail for areas within the command’s area of operations AO and battle space than for other areas in the AI. Following staff recommendations, the commander decides upon a COA and issues implementing orders. 344-130 evaluation also provides the detailed information on the threat’s current dispositions, recent rm, equipment, and organizational capabilities the staff needs to complete their own staff estimates and planning.
The entire staff executes the IPB process. When operating against a new or less well-known threat, he may need to develop his intelligence data bases and threat models concurrently. Both of these examples illustrate an informal application of IPB; that is, describe the effects of the battlefield and determine the threat’s COAs.
Figure shows this wargaming. Accordingly, the major IPB effort occurs before and during the first of five steps in the decision making process. Define the Battlefield Environment. Enter Your Email Address.
For a complete discussion of the decision making process, see FM Figure shows an example attack guidance matrix. He bases the AI’s limits on the amount of time estimated to complete the command’s mission and the location and nature of the characteristics of the battlefield which will influence the operation. A brief overview of each function is presented below.